Managing a Cost Plus Construction Contract Effectively

One of the most important and crucial steps in any type of construction project is what type of contract to establish. 

It is not at all about agreeing on any costs. It is about stating clear expectations, building trust, and ensuring that both the owner and contractor are on the same wave. 

Among the many types, the cost-plus construction contract is one of the most popular sorts of contracts for construction projects seeking flexibility and transparency. 

Simply speaking, this kind of contract pays the contractors an actual cost incurred for the project along with a fee on top to ensure their profit. 

Good for projects where changes could arise as things go, yet at the same time creates problems such as handling climbing costs and balancing risks. 

Now, let us take a closer look and know how to make it effective for all parties. 

Key Takeaways 

• Understand the basics of a cost-plus construction contract: What exactly does this type of contract involve, and why is it so different from others? 

• See why owners and contractors choose this approach: Whether you’re an owner looking for flexibility or a contractor aiming for transparency, you’ll learn what makes this contract appealing and how to handle its unique risks. 

• Learn hands-on strategies for it to work: This guide covers all the ways for managing uncertain costs to balancing risk between the parties so as to make the project remain just and collaborative at all times. 

What is a Cost-Plus Construction Contract? 

A cost-plus construction contract is basically a reimbursement contract. 

The contractor gets reimbursed for all the actual costs of the project, whether that is materials, labor, or other expenses-and also adds on an additional fee to account for profit or overhead. 

It's a far cry from a lump sum contract where, regardless of what happens during construction, the price is set in stone. 

It is designed for those projects where things might alter along the way, that is, when the scope is not fully defined, or the design changes through construction. 

There are two ways to structure a cost-plus contract, depending upon what the project needs: 

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF): Here, the contractor gets paid a fixed fee regardless of what the project ends up costing. 

Cost-Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF): The contractor can receive additional incentives when they achieve certain goals, such as completing below budget or before schedule. 

Cost-Plus Percentage of Cost: In this, the fee of the contractor is directly related to the percentage of the total cost of the project. 

Each one has its own advantages, and the right one would depend on how complex the project is and how much risk everyone is willing to take on. 

Why Owners Would Consider Cost-Plus Contracts 

Owners often ask themselves why they should opt for a cost-plus construction contract, especially when it doesn't guarantee a fixed cost. 

Flexibility: Complex or innovative construction projects seldom follow a to-the-letter plan. Design changes are often encountered, and issues can emerge, as do new opportunities that might surface during construction. Owners in cost-plus contracts are freed from rigid, often expensive terms of change orders. The flexibility offered to such dynamic or uncertain project scopes is priceless. 

Transparency: Cost-plus contracts offer owners clear transparency over the actual expenses incurred by the contractor. The detailed record of labor, materials, and other costs will also hold them accountable. It will benefit owners who are keen on knowing where their money is being spent. 

Focus on Quality: In a lump sum contract, the contractor may have an incentive to cut corners to maximize his profit. Cost-plus contracts eliminate this incentive because the contractor will be reimbursed for his actual costs. This enables the contractor to focus on quality work rather than trying to save money on materials or labor. 

Major Risks and Challenges 

Cost-plus construction contracts have many advantages, but like any agreement, they carry risks for owners and contractors alike to tread upon with caution. 

For the owners, the biggest threat is cost overrun. Since actual expenses are reimbursed according to the contract, no cap is built in, unless otherwise stated. 

Therefore, costs can quickly rise far beyond initial estimates to leave owners scrambling to readjust budgets. 

One common dispute is over cost, the allowable cost of a reimbursable expense. 

This type of disagreement puts tension in the owner-contractor relationship and delays the work. 

Last but not the least is the administrative burden. The owner needs to check every single expense submitted by the contractor. 

This layer of extra scrutiny adds complexity to the project management, taking so much time and effort. 

For contractors, the financial risks are lower since they are reimbursed for actual costs. 

However, they are not risk-free. Issues like delayed payments can disrupt cash flow, and disagreements over expenses can harm their reputation, potentially affecting future opportunities. 

So, how can owners and contractors balance these risks and build a collaborative working relationship? 

Balancing Risks Between Owners and Contractors 

Managing risks in a cost-plus contract is all about clarity and fairness. 

Start by defining allowable costs as clearly as possible. For ambiguity leads to dispute, everyone should agree at the outset regarding what is in and what is out. 

A guaranteed maximum price (GMP) can also help owners limit the exposure to unknown overruns yet combine the flexibility of a cost-plus contract with the predictability of a cap. 

Transparency is important, and frequent expense audits build trust. Contractors can use contemporary tools such as Microsoft Excel or Power BI to maintain more detailed accounting records and frequently share it with the owner. 

Structured reporting keeps people on the same page. 

Payment in conjunction with the milestones will definitely bring an element of accountability because milestone payment motivates the contractor to target project accomplishments while owners feel better when those achievements match expenditures. 

Balancing risks does not come easily; however, sound planning and communication are the 'keys to unlocking' successful cost-plus contract outcomes for both parties. 

Calculating Cost-Plus Percentage 

One of the most popular questions about cost-plus construction contracts is: How does the contractor's fee come? Usually, it's expressed as a percentage of the project’s total cost. This percentage is not arbitrary, rather it depends on several crucial factors: 

The complexity of the project: Any complex project will also imply more effort, expertise, or resources. For example, a project with detailed design, special materials, and difficult site conditions may justify the requirement for a higher percentage, accounting for the demands to be met. 

Regional norms and market conditions: Local building markets are often determinative of expectations. A fair percentage is one thing where one region is essentially different from another. Contractors and owners usually conform to the prevalent market standards to avoid over- or undercharging for their work. 

Reputation and record of contractor: The contractor who proves himself in satisfying, high-quality results often charges more. This experience and reliability gain value, which owners might be willing to pay for. 

By considering these factors, owners and contractors may arrive at a fair percentage that reflects both the specific requirements of the project and the market realities. 

Managing Cost-Plus Contracts Using Microsoft 365 

Managing a cost-plus contract in Microsoft 365 requires organizations to be organized and transparent, using reliable tools. It could make all the difference in which way the process runs. 

Expense tracking: A cost-plus contract relies on monitoring costs and Microsoft 365 provides tools for this; contractors and owners can collect their expense records in centralized locations using such applications as SharePoint or Teams to easily track and verify in real-time spending. 

Clear workflows and audit trails: In Microsoft 365, establishing workflows means that everyone will follow the same process. For example, you can set up an automated approval path for submitting and reviewing expenses and include audit trails that detail each action. This level of accountability reduces the likelihood of disputes. 

Integration with reporting tools: Applications such as Microsoft Excel and Power BI can be used to integrate with your workflow for generating detailed reports and dashboards. It gives insights into spending patterns, project progress, and potential risks, thus helping owners and contractors make informed decisions. 

Automating Approvals: Microsoft Power Automate will automate the approval process. The approval process saves the user's time and reduces the risk of error. Stakeholders will be notified to review and approve expenses, resulting in better oversight and smooth collaboration. 

Using Microsoft 365 in full means managing a cost-plus contract is less paperwork and more clarity and control in the process of a project. 

Final Thoughts 

A cost-plus construction contract is one of the best approaches to projects, especially where flexibility, transparency, and quality are high priorities. 

These benefits do not come without responsibilities owners and contractors should plan well, manage risk, and keep their communication lines open. Success in such a contract usually comes through clear terms, trust, and proper organization during the project execution. 

If you’re considering this approach, take the time to prepare thoroughly and prioritize collaboration. It’s a balance, but when done well, it can deliver great results. 

Like our content? Subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn for more insights and updates.